Debate has sparked in Japan over public funding for the security of Prince Harry. There is an ongoing discussion on the matter, with some advocating for government responsibility and others opposing this notion due to concerns over the impact on taxpayers. The exact cost of the prince's security and who should bear it remains uncertain and hotly debated.

The issues of public funds and government responsibility are always sensitive in Japan, a society that values public consesus, efficient use of resources and respect for public service. The decision regarding Prince Harry’s security could set a precedent for future similar cases. Peace and dignity are also treasured, and as such, ensuring the safety of high-profile individuals visiting or living in Japan is seen as important.

In the US and EU, similar debates occur when it comes to security costs for high-profile individuals, particularly those from the royal family or with equivalent status. The difference lies in responsibility; often, the host country's government takes on the responsibility for ensuring security, especially in the case of official visits or permanent moves.