In 2009, a horrifying arson attack left 15 people injured or dead in Japan, an event that rocked the nation. More than a decade later, justice has finally been served with the execution of the perpetrator. The shocking crime and the time it took to deliver the verdict highlight issues about the Japanese judiciary and sentencing system, as well as the ongoing debate around capital punishment.

Crimes of such heinous nature are fairly rare in Japan, making this a high-profile case that garnered significant public attention. Despite the severity of the crime, the time it took to reach a verdict has drawn criticism towards the pace of Japan's Judiciary system. Furthermore, Japan's use of capital punishment is a controversial issue, with public sentiment divided between those advocating for its deterrent effect and others opposing it on ethical grounds.

In contrast, the U.S and EU generally have swifter judicial proceedings for such grave crimes. However, differences exist in sentencing, with the EU abolishing capital punishment entirely, while the U.S uses it variably based on individual state laws. The intense discussion about capital punishment is common across Japan, the US, and the EU, reflecting universal human rights concerns.