Japan's decision to reduce its consumption tax has led to widespread critiques from international media. The government's action, aimed at boosting domestic consumption amid grim economic outlook, is seen by many as a short-term fix that might hurt long-term revenue generation. The effects of the decrease in consumption tax will echo across sectors and demographics, potentially impacting the nation's deficit and services.

Inside Japan, the consumption tax cut is broadly popular among the population, especially among lower-income individuals who stand to benefit the most out of the reduction. However, there is a long-term concern among economic experts who predict that it might lack the necessary budget to sustain the welfare and aging society of Japan, potentially leading to a fiscal crisis in the long run. The topic is a subject of intense debate with values of economic prudence and social welfare at the heart of these discussions.

Contrarily, in the EU and US, policies are typically aimed at maintaining or incrementing taxes to finance social programs and other core functions of the state. Any proposed tax cuts often result in intense debates, with many fearing the potential erosion of social security nets and public services.