The Japanese Supreme Court conducts a public review, offering insights into the backgrounds and qualifications of its judges. This process, unique to Japan, creates transparency and encourages public trust in the nation's judicial system. It's an important event that could affect future verdicts and the overall rule of law in the country.

Japan values public disclosure in its legal system. The national review process for Supreme Court judges, mandated by the Japanese Constitution, showcases that transparency. It allows the public to evaluate judges' achievements, qualifications, and conduct, fostering public interest in judicial activities and reinforcing trust in the system.

In the US or EU, judges are typically appointed for life (or for a long term), without a similar public review process. The appointment process is generally through executive nomination and legislative confirmation. However, some US states use a retention election system, which has similarities to Japan's national review process.