The possibility of dissolving the House of Representatives within the year seems unlikely in Japan, according to the latest reports. Despite speculated pressure for a snap election, governmental authorities appear set on maintaining the current parliamentary status quo. This decision, influenced by various socio-political conditions, will likely have prominent implications for current members of the House and the execution of ongoing policy projects.

In Japan, the dissolution of the House of Representatives is a crucial decision often related to political strategy or crisis management. The current administration's hesitance to proceed with this step indicates an effort to ensure stability amidst potential political disruptions. Public opinion in Japan often fluctuates with such decisions, demonstrating the public's vested interest in policy stability and political leadership.

In contrast to Japan, the US does not have a parliamentary system, but rather a fixed-term system where the House of Representatives serves for two years. Therefore, they do not have an equivalent process of dissolution. In the EU, individual countries with parliamentary systems like the UK, Germany, and Italy have distinct rules about dissolution, which are often tied to votes of no confidence or achieving set legislative deadlines.