The expansive demolition of old buildings in the culturally-rich Noto region of Japan is attracting some criticism for going too far. Opinions are divided, with progress proponents arguing that the move is necessary for urban development, while preservationists worry that the hasty erasure of these historical structures could lead to irreversible loss of heritage. The demolition decisions are in progress, sparking a critical public discussion on synchronizing development with culture preservation.

Within Japan, there's an ongoing tension between embracing modernity and preserving ancient traditions and structures. Many Japanese appreciate their history and cultural heritage, viewing them as the core of their national identity. Such demolitions often stir public opinion, triggering debates that extend beyond architectural significance to social and legal values of preservation, historical identity, and responsible urban planning.

Much like in Japan, urban development issues in the US and the EU share a similar struggle between progress and history. It's a struggle of balancing the need for infrastructure development with the preservation of historical and cultural landmarks. However, there is generally more legal protection for historic sites and structures in the US and EU, often requiring lengthy public consultation and review periods before approval of any significant changes.