In an unprecedented move in the Japanese courts, illustrations of victims are being used to consider jurors' sentiments. This practice, part of a broader endeavor to enhance jurors' understanding of cases, is raising concerns about potential bias or emotional manipulation. While some argue that this method yields more humanity to the process, others are worried it might distort the balance of justice. This development has stirred debatable discussions about the direction of Japan's legal practices.

In Japan, there’s a strong focus on respect for the victims, which makes this news significant. Also, the nation recently introduced the jury system to involve citizens in the judicial process more directly. However, this move is being regarded skeptically by some as they feel it could unnecessarily stir emotions and affect the objective judgment of the jurors.

In comparison, courts in the US and EU primarily rely on testimonies, medical reports, and tangible evidence. Emotional factors are typically kept in check to prevent an emotional bias. The introduction of sympathetic attachments in the form of artwork is considered unusual and might be viewed as borderline manipulation in Western courts.