As cases of cancel culture start to increase, Japan finds itself grappling with this contentious issue. The concept refers to public shaming or boycotting someone over perceived wrongs or mistakes, often leading to significant consequences including job losses and damaging public image. With numerous instances occurring recently, the nation is divided on how to respond to these situations, resulting in a dynamic debate over the merits and drawbacks of this internet-driven phenomenon.

Japanese society traditionally emphasizes uniformity and agreement, and this nature often prevents dissenting voices from being heard. Now, as cancel culture starts to permeate the society, it leads to a power shift and a new platform for criticisms and the contestation of authority. There are growing concerns over the impact of public shaming on individuals' lives, as well as the potential for misuse by those desiring to harm others under the guise of social justice.

Like in the US and EU, Japan is experiencing divided opinions on cancel culture. While some view it as a method for previously unheard voices to take a stand against injustices, others see it as a form of mob justice that can ruin lives without due process. However, free speech is more constitutionally protected in places like the US, leading to interesting conversations about how to balance criticism and censorship, which are taking a distinctly different shape in Japan.