The issue of providing welfare benefits to foreigners has recently sparked a heated debate in Japan. This debate is driven by a strain on the country's social services, creating contention among citizens about who should be entitled to receive these benefits. While some fear an influx of foreign beneficiaries may burden taxpayers, others argue for a universal approach that doesn't discriminate based on nationality. The government is yet to announce any changes in policy amidst this controversy.

Japan has a rapidly aging population that heavily relies on public welfare. The topic of foreigners receiving these benefits is sensitive as many believe this could put more strain on an already overstretched system. However, there is also a strong ethical argument within society that promotes inclusivity and equal rights for all residents, irrespective of their nationality.

Unlike Japan, both the EU and US have more relaxed policies towards providing social services to immigrants. In the EU, migrants are entitled to equal treatment with nationals in areas such as social security. Similar provisions exist in the US, with immigrants being eligible for certain public benefits if they meet specific criteria. However, the debate over immigrant access to public benefits is controversial in both regions.